<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bet Blogger &#187; Wagering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betblogger.net/category/wagering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betblogger.net</link>
	<description>To bet or not to bet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Arbitrage using bookmakers</title>
		<link>http://www.betblogger.net/2010/06/arbitrage-using-bookmakers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betblogger.net/2010/06/arbitrage-using-bookmakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wagering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bookmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calculators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online arbitrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outcomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betblogger.net/?p=2749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This type of arbitrage takes advantage of different odds offered by different bookmakers. Assume the following situation: We consider an event with 2 possible outcomes (e.g. a tennis match &#8211; either Federer wins or Henman wins), the idea can be generalized to events with more outcomes, but we use this as an example. The 2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="Sports betting" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2543/3938971455_af403e3a48.jpg" alt="" width="299" height="224" />This type of arbitrage takes advantage of different odds offered by different  bookmakers. Assume the following situation:</p>
<p>We consider an event with 2 possible outcomes (e.g. a tennis match &#8211; either  Federer wins or Henman wins), the idea can be generalized to events with more  outcomes, but we use this as an example.</p>
<p>The 2 bookmakers have different ideas of who has the best chances of winning.  They offer the following Fixed-odds gambling on the outcomes of the event</p>
<table id="table1" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Bookmaker 1</td>
<td>Bookmaker2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Outcome 1</td>
</em>.25</td>
</em>.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Outcome 2</td>
</sub>.9</td>
<sub>.85</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>For an individual bookmaker, the <strong>sum of the inverse of all outcomes</strong> of  an event will always be greater than 1. 1.25 <sup>− 1</sup> + 3.9 <sup>− 1</sup> = 1.056 and 1.43 <sup>− 1</sup> + 2.85 <sup>− 1</sup> = 1.051</p>
<p>The fraction above 1, is the bookmakers return rate, the amount the bookmaker  earns on offering bets at some event. Bookmaker 1 will in this example expect to  earn 5.6% on bets on the tennis game. Usually these gaps will be in the order 8  &#8211; 12%.</p>
<p>The idea is to find odds at different bookmakers, where the sum of the  inverse of all the outcomes are below 1. Meaning that the bookmakers disagree on  the chances of the outcomes. This discrepancy can be used to obtain a profit.</p>
<p>For instance if one places a bet on outcome 1 at bookmaker 2 and outcome 2 at  bookmaker 1:</p>
<p>1.43 <sup>− 1</sup> + 3.9 <sup>− 1</sup> = 0.956</p>
<p>Placing a bet of 100$ on outcome 1 with bookmaker 2 and a bet of $100 * 1.43 / 3.9 = 36.67 on outcome 2 at bookmaker  1 would ensure the bettor a profit.</p>
<p>In case outcome 1 comes out, one could collect <em>r</em><sub>1</sub> = $100 * 1.43 = $143 from bookmaker 2. In case outcome 2 comes out, one  could collect <em>r</em><sub>2</sub> = $36.67 * 3.9 = $143  from bookmaker 1. One would have invested $136.67, but have collected $143, a  profit of $6.33 (%4.6) no matter the outcome of the event.</p>
<p>So for 2 odds <em>o</em><sub>1</sub> and <em>o</em><sub>2</sub>, where  <em>o</em><sub>1</sub><sup>-1</sup>+ <em>o</em><sub>2</sub><sup>-1</sup> &lt; 1. If one wishes to place stake <em>s</em><sub>1</sub> at outcome 1, then one should  place <em>s</em><sub>2</sub> = <em>s</em><sub>1</sub> * <em>o</em><sub>1</sub> / <em>o</em><sub>2</sub> at outcome 2, to even out the odds, and receive  the same return no matter the outcome of the event.</p>
<p>Or in other words, if there are two outcomes, a 2/1 and a 3/1, by covering  the 2/1 with $500 and the 3/1 with $333, one is guaranteed to win $1000 at a  cost of $833, giving a 20% profit. More often profits exists around the 4% mark  or less.</p>
<p>Reducing the risk of human error is vital being that the mathematical formula  is sound and only external factors add &#8220;risk&#8221;. Numerous online arbitrage  calculator tools exist to help bettors get the math right. For example, the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arbcruncher.com/">Arb  Cruncher sports betting calculator</a> handles calculations for both book  arbitrage (back/back or lay/lay) and back/lay arbitrage opportunities on an  intra-exchange or inter-exchange basis, and is free.</p>
<p>This article is licensed under the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html">GNU Free Documentation License</a>.  It uses material from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<p><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RouY68iTjbQ&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RouY68iTjbQ&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betblogger.net/2010/06/arbitrage-using-bookmakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arbitrage betting in theory</title>
		<link>http://www.betblogger.net/2010/04/arbitrage-betting-in-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betblogger.net/2010/04/arbitrage-betting-in-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wagering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrage betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrage models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Back-lay sports arbitrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betting arbitrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonus sports arbitrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bookmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drawbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Making money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betblogger.net/?p=2669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a number of potential arbitrage deals. Below is an explanation of some of them including formulas and risks associated with these arbitrage deals. The table below introduces a number of variables that will be used to formalise the arbitrage models. Variable Explanation s Stake in outcome 1 s Stake in outcome 2 o [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a number of potential arbitrage deals. Below is an explanation of  some of them including formulas and risks associated with these arbitrage deals.  The table below introduces a number of variables that will be used to formalise  the arbitrage models.</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Variable</td>
<td>Explanation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>s</em><sub></sub></td>
<td>Stake in outcome 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>s</em></sub></sub></td>
<td>Stake in outcome 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>o</em><sub></sub></td>
<td>Odds for outcome 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>o</em></sub></sub></td>
<td>Odds for outcome 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>r</em><sub></sub></td>
<td>Return if outcome 1 occurs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>r</em></sub></sub></td>
<td>Return if outcome 2 occurs</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Arbitrage using  bookmakers</h3>
<p>This type of arbitrage takes advantage of different odds offered by different  bookmakers. Assume the following situation:</p>
<p>We consider an event with 2 possible outcomes (e.g. a tennis match &#8211; either  Federer wins or Henman wins), the idea can be generalized to events with more  outcomes, but we use this as an example.</p>
<p>The 2 bookmakers have different ideas of who has the best chances of winning.  They offer the following Fixed-odds gambling on the outcomes of the event</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Bookmaker 1</td>
<td>Bookmaker2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Outcome 1</td>
<td>.25</td>
<td>.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Outcome 2</td>
</em>.9</td>
<em>.85</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>For an individual bookmaker, the <strong>sum of the inverse of all outcomes</strong> of  an event will always be greater than 1. 1.25 <sup>− 1</sup> + 3.9 <sup>− 1</sup> = 1.056 and 1.43 <sup>− 1</sup> + 2.85 <sup>− 1</sup> = 1.051</p>
<p>The fraction above 1, is the bookmakers return rate, the amount the bookmaker  earns on offering bets at some event. Bookmaker 1 will in this example expect to  earn 5.6% on bets on the tennis game. Usually these gaps will be in the order 8  &#8211; 12%.</p>
<p>The idea is to find odds at different bookmakers, where the sum of the  inverse of all the outcomes are below 1. Meaning that the bookmakers disagree on  the chances of the outcomes. This discrepancy can be used to obtain a profit.</p>
<p>For instance if one places a bet on outcome 1 at bookmaker 2 and outcome 2 at  bookmaker 1:</p>
<p>1.43 <sup>− 1</sup> + 3.9 <sup>− 1</sup> = 0.956</p>
<p>Placing a bet of 100$ on outcome 1 with bookmaker 2 and a bet of $100 * 1.43 / 3.9 = 36.67 on outcome 2 at bookmaker  1 would ensure the bettor a profit.</p>
<p>In case outcome 1 comes out, one could collect <em>r</em><sub></sub> = $100 * 1.43 = $143 from bookmaker 2. In case outcome 2 comes out, one  could collect <em>r</em></sub></sub> = $36.67 * 3.9 = $143  from bookmaker 1. One would have invested $136.67, but have collected $143, a  profit of $6.33 (%4.6) no matter the outcome of the event.</p>
<p>So for 2 odds <em>o</em><sub></sub> and <em>o</em></sub></sub>, where 0<sup>-1</sup><sub></sub> + 0<sup>-1</sup></sub></sub> &lt; 1.  If one wishes to place stake <em>s</em><sub></sub> at outcome 1, then one should place <em>s</em></sub></sub> = <em>s</em><sub></sub> * <em>o</em><sub></sub> / <em>o</em></sub></sub> at  outcome 2, to even out the odds, and receive the same return no matter the  outcome of the event.</p>
<p>Or in other words, if there are two outcomes, a 2/1 and a 3/1, by covering  the 2/1 with $500 and the 3/1 with $333, one is guaranteed to win $1000 at a  cost of $833, giving a 20% profit. More often profits exists around the 4% mark  or less.</p>
<p>Reducing the risk of human error is vital being that the mathematical formula  is sound and only external factors add &#8220;risk&#8221;. Numerous online arbitrage  calculator tools exist to help bettors get the math right. For example, the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.arbcruncher.com/">Arb  Cruncher sports betting calculator</a> handles calculations for both book  arbitrage (back/back or lay/lay) and back/lay arbitrage opportunities on an  intra-exchange or inter-exchange basis, and is free.</p>
<h3>Back-lay sports  arbitrage</h3>
<p>Betting exchanges have opened up a new range of arbitrage possibilities since  on the exchanges it is possible to <em>lay</em> (i.e. to bet against) as well as  to back an outcome. Arbitrage using only the back or lay side might occur on  betting exchanges. It is in principle the same as the arbitrage using different  bookmakers. Arbitrage using back and lay side is possible if a lay bet on one  exchange provides shorter odds than a back bet on another exchange or bookmaker.  However, the commission charged by the bookmakers and exchanges must be included  into calculations.</p>
<p>Back-lay sports arbitrage is often called <em>scalping</em> or <em>trading</em>.  Scalping is not actually arbitrage, but short term trading. In the context of  sports arbitrage betting a scalping trader or scalper looks to make lots of  small profits, which in time can add up. In theory a trader could turn a small  investment into large profits by re-investing his earlier profits into future  bets so as to generate exponential growth. Scalping relies on liquidity in the  markets and that the odds fill flucuate around a mean point. A key advantage to  scalping on one exchange is that most exchanges charge commission only on the  net winnings in a particular event, thus ensuring that even the smallest  favourable difference in the odds will guarantee some profit.</p>
<h3>Bonus sports arbitrage</h3>
<p>Many bookmakers offer first time users a signup bonus in the range $10 &#8211; $200  for depositing an initial amount. They typically demand that this amount is  wagered a number of times before the bonus can be withdrawn. <strong>Bonus sport  arbitraging</strong> is a form of sports arbitraging where you hedge or back your  bets as usual, but since you received the bonus, a small loss can be allowed on  each wager (2-5 %), which comes off your profit. In this way the bookmakers  wagering demand can be met and the initial deposit and sign up bonus can be  withdrawn with little loss.</p>
<p>The advantage over usual <strong>betting arbitrage</strong> is that it is a lot easier  to find bets with an acceptable loss, instead of an actual profit. Since most  bookmakers offer these bonuses this can potentially be exploited to harvest the  sign up bonuses.</p>
<p><strong>Making money</strong></p>
<p>By signing up to various bookmakers, it&#8217;s possible to turn these &#8216;free&#8217; bets  into cash fairly quickly, and either making a small arbitrage, or in the  majority of cases, making a small loss on each bet, or trade. However, it is  relatively time consuming to find close matched bets or arbs, which is where an  arb / close matched bet service is useful.</p>
<p><strong>Drawbacks</strong></p>
<p>As well as spending time physically matching odds from various bet sites to  exchanges, the other draw back with bonus bagging / arb trading in this sense is  that often the free bets are &#8216;non-stake returned&#8217;. This effectively reduces the  odds, in decimal format, by 1. Therefore, in order to reduce &#8216;losses&#8217; on the  free bet, it is necessary to place a bet with high odds, so that the percentage  difference of the decrease in odds is minimalised.</p>
<p>This article is licensed under the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html">GNU Free Documentation License</a>.  It uses material from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CVfST9pw5WM&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CVfST9pw5WM&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betblogger.net/2010/04/arbitrage-betting-in-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arbitrage betting</title>
		<link>http://www.betblogger.net/2010/01/arbitrage-betting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.betblogger.net/2010/01/arbitrage-betting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wagering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrage betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betting arbitrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betting investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betting markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bettors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miraclebets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports arbitraging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surebets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betblogger.net/?p=1146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Betting arbitrage, miraclebets, surebets, sports arbitraging is a particular case of arbitrage arising on betting markets due to either bookmakers&#8217; different opinions on event outcomes or plain errors. By placing one bet per each outcome with different betting companies, the bettor can make a profit. As long as different Bookmakers are used for arbitrage betting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vramak/3499502280/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1147" title="Soccer" src="http://www.betblogger.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/3499502280_a1a8ce4474.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="338" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Betting arbitrage</strong>, <strong>miraclebets</strong>, <strong>surebets</strong>, <strong>sports  arbitraging</strong> is a particular case of arbitrage arising on betting markets due  to either bookmakers&#8217; different opinions on event outcomes or plain errors. By  placing one bet per each outcome with different betting companies, the bettor  can make a profit. As long as different Bookmakers are used for arbitrage  betting the Bookmakers do not have a problem with this. Each Bookmaker will  still make profit due to their calculations.</p>
<p>In the bettors&#8217; slang an arbitrage is often referred to as an <strong>arb</strong>;  people who use arbitrage are called <strong>arbers</strong>. A typical arb is around 2%,  often less, however 4%-5% are also normal and during some special events they  might reach 20%.</p>
<p>Arbitrage Betting involves relatively large sums of money (stakes are bigger  than in normal betting) while another variety, <strong>betting investment</strong>, means  placing relatively small bets systematically on overvalued odds most of which  will lose but some win thus making a profit.</p>
<p>The best way of generating profit, which has been established in Britain via  sports arbitrage, consists of &#8216;key men&#8217; employing others to place bets on their  behalf, so as to avoid detection and increase accessibility to bookmakers. This  allows the financiers or key arbers to stay at a computer to keep track of  market movement.</p>
<p>This guide is licensed under the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html">GNU Free Documentation License</a>.  It uses material from the <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gFT8Bf8u-kw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gFT8Bf8u-kw&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.betblogger.net/2010/01/arbitrage-betting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
